Monthly Archives: April 2016

Globalist Systems Theory




You can only understand the American political system by understanding what I call the “Globalist Systems Theory” (GST)

The globalist elites have a “home game” and an “away game.” The home game (in the Western Core) is political correctness, anti-Christianity, anti-whiteness, open borders, forced diversity, White genocide, attacks on the family, and degeneracy of all sorts. The away game (in the non-Western Periphery) is war, neo-liberal privatization, color revolutions, and coup d’etats.

The main job of the left in America is to carry out the home game while the right pretends to oppose them. The main job of the right in America is to carry out the away game while the left pretends to oppose them. The one exception to this is deindustrialization.  Deindustrialization is part of the “home game” but pushed hardest by the right while the left pretends to oppose it (it was Bill Clinton who signed NAFTA).

The wars in the Middle East and subsequent refugee crises into Europe display the dynamics of this system perfectly.  The wars in the Middle East are intended to defeat secular regimes (under the pretext of fighting terrorism), which causes the Middle East to be in chaos. This allows the globalist elites to better play peoples off each other and keep them in disarray while they take control of resource flows and encircle Russia and China.  It’s no mistake that Iraq, Syria, and Libya are or were allies of Russia and/or partners with China. These wars caused the refugee crisis which is used to flood Europe with non-Europeans for the purpose of anti-Whiteness and forced diversity which are elements of the White genocide program. So there are military personnel from the West going to the Middle East to destroy towns which results in refugees being flooded into the same towns of the military personnel who destroyed the refugee’s towns.

There was a similar dynamic with the signing of NAFTA. NAFTA resulted in the industrialization of America and the massive loss of agricultural capability in Mexico. This resulted in masses of Mexican immigrants flooding into the US. These immigrants are then used to push White genocide in America. This also helped big GMO producing agriculture to increase economies of scale which resulted in more American small farms to fall.  Here we got Mexicans leaving Mexico because their farms went under and coming to America to work on huge industrial farms while the populations near these industrial farms get to live with the Mexican workers.

This system allows the globalist elites to destroy their enemies at home (The non-elite people of the West) and destroy their enemies away (the rest of the world except for the puppets).  After they obtain control over their enemies away they will push the same program of political correctness, forced integration, attacks on the family, degeneracy of all sorts, and attacks of nationally or ethnic identity.

The goal of the globalist elites is a system of totally controlled global government with them at the top of the pyramid of power. The rest of the “profane,” goyim” chiseled from rough Ashlar to perfected Ashlar in order to fit as bricks underneath them.  It’s critical to understand that they’re only allegiance is to themselves and to their plan of global government.  They’re not “left” or “right” but support “left” or “right” when they’re needed.

A globalist like George Soros is the consummate globalist.  Soros funds NGOs to start color revolutions to change populist regimes in the former USSR into ones who will accept neoliberal privatization of state industries and debt to the World Bank. But Soros uses other NGOs to push open borders and racial agitation in the U.S.

You must keep Globalist Systems Theory in mind when thinking about why the American political classes react so strongly against populism or nationalism.  Populism reverses both of the games (home and away). It favors traditionalist values, strong borders and economic protectionism at home, while favoring a much less interventionist foreign policy away. Populism puts the citizens of the country first and not the interests of transnational elite.  In the case of Trump, it includes having friendly relations with the biggest populist country in the world; Russia.  This is why Trump is so hated by the righting and leftwing globalist controlled political establishments.

Trump (if he’s legit?) will stomp on both (home and away) games of the two headed globalist snake.




God is Love AND Order


In part two of my “Why Christianity” series I ended it by pointing out that God is Love and Order. I think it’s important that I reiterate this point.

In the Gospel according to John verse 4:4 it says the following:

The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

Just like verses regarding “strangers” in the Bible this verse is used to forward many a unnatural agendas. This verse is used to argue that “the only thing that matters is love.”  People in liberal protestant denominations make this argument regarding the sanctioning of gay marriage in their churches. But in Leviticus 20:13 it says

‘If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death.

Of course, then people will make the argument that Jesus changed all that “rules and regulations” stuff. But then we read in 1st Corinthians 6:9-11

“Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

So what gives? If God is Love, then why can’t two men (or women) get married and bugger each other for the glory of the loving God?  The reason is that God is also Order. God sets forth certain rules that we must abide by to make us better off and He does this out of love. These rules can be hard to live by, but they’re for our own good. People seem to disagree most with the rules regarding sex. But think about the disastrous effect the “sexual revolution” has had on Western society.  The “sexual revolution” was supposed to lead more happiness but today people are more miserable than in times past.


This isn’t a matter of either/or, it’s both/and.  Love and Order work in conjunction.  This is the heart and brain. This is the mother and the father.  This is the proper balance between the left and right sides of the brain. The esoteric teacher Mark Passio discusses this dynamic in his lectures on the sacred feminine and sacred masculine. If one examines the Bible one notices that the Old Testament was the book of Order (or Law) while the New Testament is the Book of Love.


What we see in much of modern Christianity is an imbalanced focus on love over order. For much of Christian history it was the other way around, but today love is the answer to everything. In a way, I would agree that “love is the answer” but only in conjunction with order. In fact, love without order might not be love at all.

A child brings home a sad, homeless puppy soaked to the bone from rain. You might keep it. But what if a child brings home 10 homeless puppies?  Unless you’re a lonely 40 year old women, you wouldn’t keep 10 puppies (or kittens in that case) because this wouldn’t benefit anyone. What if you have a cat at home that gets attacked by these 10 puppies?  I suppose the “all you need is love” crowd would argue that the cat should be punished for using its nails to defend itself? Bringing 10 puppies into the house is not love but a sign of mental illness at best.

Not LOve

Love not working in conjunction with order is not love just as order not working in conjunction with love is not order. A system based purely on the “letter of the law” will lead to chaos as well, as people rebel against the lack of compassion, understanding, and mercy. This balance of love and order corresponds with the roles of the Church and Monarchy in the middle Ages. The Monarchy was supposed to hold up the law and defend the people in return for labor. The Church had a social welfare role and was supposed to intervene when the lords became unjust or oppressive. The lord acted as the father while “Holy Mother Church” acted as the mother. Of course things didn’t always work out this way as many times the high offices of the Church would be manned by sons of lords making both Church and Monarchy on the same side. When this happens an opening occurs for a French Revolution type situation when the scum of the earth take over filling the void with promises of “liberty, equality, and fraternity.”

When you neglect order for too long the road back to order is usually very bumpy. When people live too much outside of the Truth (God’s law), the whole thing comes down. What the story of Sodom and Gomorrah teaches us is that disorder will not be tolerated forever. This is what we’re seeing today in the modern Western world. There’s an elite who push everything unnatural to human nature, from forced integration, to GMO foods, to “irregular family situations,” to siding with criminals over law enforcement, to degenerate media of all sorts. When Sodom and Gomorrah became too disorderly, God rained fire on it. Also recall that when the angels said to not look back; they meant it (as Lot’s wife found out). The farther things fall away from order, the harsher the return will be.

Another story worth considering is the story of the tower of Babel.  There are different ways of interpreting this story. But if the story tells us one thing it’s that God does not like a centralized system that does away with all differences. This is unnatural for God. Eventually the Lord had to knock down the tower(s).  I suppose it shouldn’t surprise us that today we see a globalist elite, that venerates Lucifer, not only pushing a degenerate Sodom and Gomorrah culture on us but also trying to build a one world system that does away with all differences.

The road back to order will be bumpy.






Why Christianity? (Part3)


Part 2

Part 1

In continuing my argument in favor of Christianity being the spiritual-cultural organizing principle for the West, I’m going to cover other arguments made against it by racialists and others.

The one argument that I think is the most legitimate (against Christianity being the spiritual-cultural organizing principle for the West) is that Christianity is a foreign religion to Europe. It points out that the root of Christianity is Jewish and that Christianity itself was created by Jews. The folks who point this out say that the West should resort to  religions which were thought up by the minds of Europeans.  Usually they advocate for the old pagan religions, but if not paganism, racialists will argue for a Nietzschean ideal that advocates transcending ourselves into something better (i.e. the Ubermenschen).  Those with a materialist outlook will advocate for a “might is right” collective ideal where DNA is the highest good.  I will now address these.

First I will address the “Jewishness” of Christianity.  It is true that Jesus Christ was a Hebrew, most likely of semitic blood.  From a racial perspective, this is true. But from a spiritual or an ideological perspective, Christianity is the exact opposite of Judaism.  Christianity attempts to provide “salvation” through this earthly realm on into eternity by becoming one with God through Christ. It’s a religion about living in harmony and in unity with others within the “Body of Christ.”  It’s a Universalist religion that claims that all people are spiritual equals. Judaism on the other hand is a tribal religion that advocates world supremacy by one tribe of people. This group of people was “chosen” by God to lead the goyim (cattle) of the world. The Messiah of the Jewish people is supposed to be a military leader, which will help the Jewish people crush all those who oppose them.  The religion of Judaism doesn’t really consider the afterlife.  Its goal is to build “heaven on earth” or a “New Israel.”


The Jewish people were chosen by God to be a vehicle to deliver the Savior of the World. Why did God choose the Jews for this mission?  I can’t claim to know the mind of God but if you look at the Jesus story we see that hope comes from unexpected places. Jesus was born in a humble manger. He rode into Jerusalem on a modest donkey. And through His death, and what looked like ultimate defeat, he saved the world.  From a logistical perspective, God chose the Jews because they would be part of the Roman Empire. The Faith spread into the Roman Empire and eventually became the State religion of the Roman Empire.  The Faith then spread through Europe and brought to Europe a unity it never would have had under the old religions.  Had Islam attacked a Europe without Christianity, I doubt a unified effort would have been possible.  The Faith then spread to the New World by Europeans. Perhaps God chose the Jews for the reason a liberal protestant woman pastor once told me when I asked her why Jesus came from the Jews “because they needed him more than everyone else” (I was amusingly shocked when this female pastor told me this considering the liberal denomination she came from).


So what about the pagan faiths of ancient Europe?  I respect these religions and find some interesting ideas in them but I simply don’t find them as beneficial to the person or society as Christianity. The highest good in the pagan Germanic religions was fame and fortune. Getting rich and having your name known in far places was the greatest thing a man could hope for.  The Greco-Roman religions were no better. The best ideas that came out of the Classical world were philosophical, not religious, and many of these philosophical ideas became a part of Christian thought (Stoicism, Platonism, Aristotle).  There’s also no evidence that they were racialist or tribal religions.  Alexander the Great wanted to mix the ancient Greeks into the whole world. The Norse or Germans had no problem with selling their kin to Muslims or selling out their tribesmen to outsiders for personal gain. The pre-Christian religious systems also required animal or human sacrifices. Instead of Easter Sunday church service, perhaps we’d take the kids down to the town square for the springtime killing of a bull, after which we’d spread the blood on each other’s foreheads?

After paganism the other idea for an ideological organizing principle for the West is a Nietzschean quasi religion of self-over becoming. This is about becoming something greater than what you are. This idea was popular with the 3rd Reich in its attempt to help evolve humans (or some humans) into a higher stage of evolution.  Just as apes became modern man, modern man would be who the Ubermenschen would evolve from.

I can certainly understand the appeal of such an ideology, but again I think its weaknesses outweigh its strengths. First of all it places all its focus on a future goal instead of learning to be at peace with the present. Working towards goals is important for individuals and society, but inner peace can never be found in accomplishment, only in learning to enjoy the present. Trying to find satisfaction is some future goal always disappoints; which then requires a new goal to accomplish. If someone has no peace in the present, no amount of accomplishment will matter.  If we’re going to have a central organizing principle, or religion, the purpose should be to bring peace to people. I’m talking about real inner peace and not distraction or chemical sedation.  We could build a great intergalactic civilization and supermen/women who look like super-models that live to be 500 years old, but if we’re not at peace, what difference does it make?  We’ll have weapons that can blow up whole planets in the hands of people who can’t sit in silence for 20 minutes.

If we do want to build a better human, what characteristics would we want to instill?  Does our Ubermenschen have the same characteristics as a Wall Street banker (ruthless desire for money), or a Hollywood actor (attention whore’s desire for fame)?  The characteristics I would advocate for are kindness, hopefulness, selflessness, charity, gratefulness, humility, discipline, patience, industriousness, honesty, and a sense of duty.   Before we can even start exploring space and building technology that can blow up planets, we better take 2 or 3 generations to work on ourselves on earth. Before we can be “higher beings” we better learn to be humans again and not animals (or slaves to our carnal desires). And we better think for a very long time before anyone starts merging humans with machines.  In fact, I would strongly advocate against merging the human mind with computers.

The last possibility for the future organizing principle for the West (instead of Christianity) is the “might is right” idea of pure materialism. This is really the worst idea out of all of them.  This ideal entails organizing ourselves based on our DNA. Apparently people with certain haplogroups would be given preferences over people with other haplogroups. These groups would be encouraged to breed with each other and out-groups would be given incentives to not breed. For the record I support people’s rights to form communities by any organizing principle they wish. If people want to start communities restricted to certain DNA groups, that’s fine with me. Of course, to my knowledge you can only test the males on your father’s line and the females in your mother’s line and not the females from your father’s line or the males from your mother’s line. Therefore, there may be a non-in-group person in the woodpile and you’d never know it.  But if this is what certain people want, then I say go-for-it.  But for a meta-spiritual system for the West, it just wouldn’t work. In Spain are some Spaniards going to get deported who have Moorish-derived DNA?  Or in Poland, will someone with a Tatar male haplogroup be deported?  Would Reinhard Heydrich (had Jewish ancestry) have been sent to Madagascar if the Germans won the 2nd world war?  Would RamzPaul be barred from any future ethno-community in North America for being “1% Jewish?”  These types of complications make a purely racial organizing principle almost impossible, besides the fact that it doesn’t really make you any better or more at peace. The Germans thought that their DNA was superior to the Russian’s DNA. The Russians ended up defeating the Germans and humiliating them.

In conclusion, I want to revisit the concept of self-over becoming that I discussed above. If we look at the most important story of Christianity, we see in it this same symbolism.  Christ dying on the cross and rising again can be understood as a metaphor for our lower selves dying in some way and our higher selves rising as something better. Usually the way to death of the old and rise of the new is through suffering.  This suffering can be as small as the suffering that comes by not eating dessert after dinner every night (in becoming a person who eventually doesn’t need dessert after dinner) to someone dealing with the loss of everything (health, family, belongings) in becoming someone unattached to the things of the world. But the bottom line is “transcending self” requires discomfort (some form of “death,” including your illusions of how the world is supposed to work) and Christ was a perfect model for this process.



Part 4